Thank you GOOGLE ! !



 "We are all Refugees in the HUMAN RACE, we need your Help. . . . .      
DR DAVID CLEVELAND 508-487-1956  or  508-487-1981
Note: The term "allopathy" was coined in 1842 by Dr. C.F.S. 
Hahnemann M.D. to designate the usual practice of medicine (allopathy) 
as opposed to homeopathy, the system of therapy that he founded 
based on the concept that disease can be treated with drugs 
(in minute doses) capable of producing the same symptoms 
in healthy people as the disease itself.



CANCER    by David Cleveland


This chapter, again uses experts voices, this time to identify orthodox medicine and its relationship to Cancer. The following M.D.s  are all orthodox doctors. (W.G.B.H. Video 1993)

Doctors Do A Lot Of Guessing

Narrator: "In fact doctors have to do a lot more guess work than is revealed to the public..."

Dr. Thomas Preston, M.D., Chief Cardiologist, Pacific Medical Center, Seattle, Washington states:

`It's called the technological imperative...its very difficult for doctors to be honest enough or to even believe themselves that doing nothing is the best course of action. That goes against all the history of medicine, which is you must do something to make the patient believe that they are getting the best treatment possible (W.G.B.H. Video 1993).

Dr. David Eddy, M.D., Health Policy Management, Duke University:

In fact, very little of medicine has been carefully evaluated in well designed, well controlled studies, it's really quite amazing, but after hundreds of years in fact, I would estimate that only about 10 to 20% of medical practices have been evaluated with well controlled studies. As long as medical schools and western medicine focuses on treatment as the end all and be all, we're not going to get anywhere. We've got to begin to focus on eliminating these diseases... How can there be any great sense of satisfaction, there has to be almost a sense of embarrassment that we don't even stop the pipeline of these diseases development (W.G.B.H. Video 1993).

One example of doctors `embarrassment', shown on a W.G.B.H. video, was that of Kathy Dawson, speaking of the death of her father during surgery:

Narrator: "The three doctors that were doing the surgery entered the waiting room where Kathy was... and she wondered..."

At that point I wondered who was minding the store...then I realized that we were in big trouble. And, all three (doctors) looked at us and said we lost him. And I was, why, what happened? Well the doctor starts to shake, he starts to cry, my heart went out to him... but he finally admitted, look I don't know how this happened, we viewed the angioplasty film and I somehow got an air bubble into the syringe...I always tip the syringe, I don't know how it happened, but that's what killed your father.

The discussion concentrates now on Cancer and all that implies for the orthodox medical establishment, first this statement about cancer.

Kathy Tedsechi, R.N.C., Long Island Medical Center,N.Y.:

Its Not Called The Practice of Medicine For Nothing

With most cancers we feel five years is a cure rate...five years is not necessarily their cure rate. That we have seen reoccurrences happen as much as fifteen, twenty years later....

We don't call it the practice of medicine for nothing, it is practice, we are humans we are not perfect, we make mistakes, and this mistake of DES was a combination mistake between the drug companies and the medical profession so blindly excepting this drug and giving it so widely. Here on the East Coast they gave this drug to almost everybody (W.G.B.H. Video 1993).

Medicine Is Not Scientific Enough

Dr. Lewis Thomas, of the Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

`...One of the major problems with medicine today is that it is not scientific enough. (W.G.B.H. Video 1993)

From The Cancer Manual, published by The American Cancer Society, comes information from their last chapter titled, Worthless Methods Of Cancer Management, by Helene G. Brown (Appendix A).

Out of all the contributors to this manual, most having a medical degree, Brown is the only contributor with no degree listed. All that can be found is that she is The National, Vice President, of The American Cancer Society. It also is noted that this society is not a government organization but a voluntary organization.

The Cancer Nutrition Connection. Brown uses the last chapter of this manual to propagandize against alternative therapies and to boost the credibility of what orthodox medicine has to offer. She claims that the following do not cause cancer therefore, there is no reason to not use them. From Page 452... Meat, fish and fowl; dairy products; animal protein; no need to increase intake of fruits or vegetables, and in fact not eating the above can harm the cancer patient. On page 457 she states in italics that, Proper nutrition is indeed important to maintain health. That its especially important for people with cancer to follow their doctor's instructions about good nutrition.

Most alternative nutritionists would advocate a definite change of diet for the cancer patient. An example would be the cancer patient being asked to give up the eating of red meat as it speeds up the metabolism of the body in digesting it. This is energy that the body could use for healing itself. Also considered are the toxins in the meat that may add to the cancer.

Trust Me...I Don't Know

You may note that in my chapter on Nutrition, that many experts, including M.D.'s spoke out against the medical doctor's lack of nutritional training. They take about 10 classes and these classes have a chemical interest slant to them. The cancer patient is asked to trust their 'expert', with a field of learning they have no, or very little, knowledge of?

  Do Not Shape Cancers

Brown persists in her article with, "...there is no scientific evidence to indicate that attitudes reduce mortality from cancer. "However, you can read about Norman Cousins experience, hailed and written about by hundreds of orthodox medical journals. In addition, he lectured at hundreds of medical schools.

Brown goes on; "Methods that require that patients accept the idea that their emotions contributed to their cancer are innocuous." And yet, on page 456 she proposes, "If a patient needs a psychologist, make certain that one is available." She also recommends, "The doctors should help the patient and family to maintain an attitude of hope when that is realistic, and make clear that an appropriate hope might be for a cure in many cases, for control and palliation in other cases...."

Can't Handle Your Cancer?

Other premises that Brown builds on. The patient is out of touch with reality if they cannot accept the "necessity for a painful operation, or reaction to radiation or drugs." She says, a cancer patient is also... "Impatient, desperate, frustrated, emotionally maladjusted, concerned about costs, has anti-establishment feelings, has a do-it-yourself attitude, grasps at straws, and may have been abandoned by their friends and family." She states, with Quackery you will find that there will be a claim that only specifically trained doctors will be able to produce results and that the formula of their drugs are a secret. Brown- "When a patient has cancer, than a 'cancer expert' should be the doctor of choice." (Brown 1986)

Experts Are Assumed Successful, Right?

My question is, Can such experts exist among the orthodox medicine that she is promoting? If experts exist, why do the statistics all say that they are losing a fifty year battle against cancer? (Sullivan 1991)

The American Cancer Societies BlackList

You can see that the societies above are lying and cheating. Brown includes herself into this category when she makes a list of all the alternative cancer therapies. She goes on to say that, they are all unproven, including The Hoxsey treatment. (Brown, 1986 451)

Federal Judge: "Hoxsey Cured Cancer"

Speaking of the Hoxsey treatment, Morris Fishbein appointed to be the President of the A.M.A. from 1924- 1949, was responsible for the persecution of Hoxsey. Hoxsey was persecuted for his unique treatment of cancer patients.

A.M.A President, Failed Anatomy. The A.M.A.'s professional standards couldn't have been as high as they like to make us think they are, when they hired Morris. Because, the record shows that he never practiced medicine a day in his life and actually failed anatomy while in medical school. However, they got what they must have wanted as Fishbein went on to make the A.M.A look like fools. He proceeded to disgrace Hoxsey and any alternative cancer therapies that existed. Fishbeins career was best summed up by Justice W.L. Thornton, after deciding for Hoxsey's cancer treatment.

"I am in the firm opinion and belief that Hoxsey has cured these people of cancer. Hoxsey has been done a great injustice...articles and utterances by defendant Morris Fishbein were false, slanderous, and libelous" (Lynes, 1989 32).

Most people, after being told by a federal Judge that they were in the wrong and were guilty of false, slanderous and libelous statements in court would, if they did not go to jail , back off and correct the situation and make amends. This isn't what happened in the Hoxsey Cancer Treatment case. I have included as (Appendix A) a one page pamphlet ordered from the American Cancer Societies' office in Boston, Massachusetts. Its entitled Unproven Methods of Cancer Management. Within the pamphlet are listed 23 treatments for cancer. Among these treatments, which all have had results, is The Hoxsey Method. The medical establishment, told by a judge that they were wrong about Hoxsey in 1934, by way of the American Cancer Society, doesn't think twice about discrediting Hoxsey in the year 1993.

A.M.A. Was Hasty, Capricious, Arbitrary and Dishonest

In 1953, U.S. Senator Tobey hired attorney, Ben Fitzgerald, from the Justice Department, to conduct an investigation into the cancer industry. The following are some of his results, recorded in the Congressional record of August 28, 1953.

There is reason to believe that the A.M.A. has been hasty, capricious, arbitrary, and outright dishonest...If radium, X-RAYS, or surgery or either of them is the complete answer, then the greatest hoax of the age is being perpetrated upon the people by the continued appeal for funds for further research. If neither X-rays, radium or surgery is the complete answer to this dreaded disease, and I submit that it is not, then what is the duty of society? Should we stand still? Should we sit idly by and count the number of physicians, surgeons and cancerologists, who are not only divided but who, because of fear or favor, are forced to line up with the so-called accepted view of the American Medical Association, or should this committee make a full- scale investigation of the organized effort to hinder, suppress and restrict the free flow of drugs which allegedly have proven successful in cases where clinical records, case history, pathological reports and X-RAYS photographic proof, together with the alleged cured patients, are available?...My investigation to date should convince this committee that a conspiracy does exist to stop the free flow and use of drugs in interstate commerce which allegedly (have) solid therapeutic value. Public and private funds have been thrown around like confetti at a country fair, top close and destroy clinics, hospitals and scientific research laboratories, which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations. How long will the American people take this? (Lynes, 1989 171)

A.M.A. Subjugated To The Drug Industry

You might have thought such a condemnatory statement from the Government would shake things up, but On February 6, 1973, twenty years after the above report to congress, two former chairmen and one vice-chairman (from the A.M.A's own Council on Drugs) testified before the United States Congress. They testified that the A.M.A. stands accused of being "A captive of and beholden to the pharmaceutical industry."

A.M.A Violates Anti-Trust Laws

Then, on September 25, 1987, which was thirty-four years after the above report, The A.M.A. was again found guilty in U.S. Court, this time for violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act..."the court has held that the conduct of the A.M.A., and it's members constituted a conspiracy in restraint of trade." (Lynes, 1989 53)

Who shall decide, when doctors disagree,

And soundest casuists doubt, like you and me?

Alexander Pope, epi iii To Lord Bathurst, (1733).

There is a lot of information available that shows that Americans have been, and are betrayed concerning Cancer. Contemplate Dean Burks' words, at the time (1972) in charge of the National Cancer Institutes cytochemistry section, and a veteran of 32 years. He blew the whistle when he wrote to Congress and testified that high officials were deliberately falsifying information, lying and committing unconstitutional acts, and in other ways thwarting potential cancer cures, that they are opposed to. . That statement was from an insider, and yet Americans still act as though all is being done for them. They are also told to believe that the very best of medical care is only available here in the United States. (Lynes 1989)

From the book, The Cancer Ward

On hearing that a certain fungus, growing on birch trees can cure cancer, he answered his fellow patients' questions by,

It's a long business Ahmadjan. Some people don't like learning new things and are so obstructive, some try to stop it to promote their own remedies, but we don't have any choice (Solzhenitsyn, 1969 143).

More evidence? Here's a statement made by The New England Journal Of Medicine...

"We are losing the war against cancer." (Bailer 1986)

Pat McGrady, science editor, of 25 years, for the American Cancer Society had the following to say about his own employer:

Control Cancer With A Check-up, and a Check...Phony!!

The American Cancer Societies slogan, Control Cancer With A check-up and a Check,'s a phony, because we are not controlling cancer. This slogan is the extent of the A.C.S. scientific, medical, and clinical savvy. Nobody in the science and medical departments there is doing any real science. They are wonderful professionals who know how to raise money. They don't know how to prevent cancer or cure patients; instead they close the door to innovative ideas. A.C.S. money goes to scientists who put on the best show to get grants, or have friends on the grant giving panels (Lynes, 1989 51).

Cure Cancer and Put Themselves Out Of Business

David Rorvik writes in, In Defense Of Unorthodoxy, That the American Cancer Society might not be able to afford to find a cure for cancer, because their very organizational charter, which was set up as an `emergency organization' in 1913, by law, has to disband if a cure for cancer is found. (Lynes, 1989 53)

Dr. John Cairns, of Harvard Universities School Of Public Health, writing in Scientific American, stated that he was depressed. As only a few rare cancers can be treated successfully by chemotherapy. (Lynes, 1989 10)

Dr. John Richards, M.D., wants to challenge anyone to show any kind of evidence that any random group of breast cancer patients do any better by using X-RAYS, chemotherapy or even surgery than those women that are untreated. (Lynes, 1989 10)

Dr Levin of the University of California says, "Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers." Dr Bailer writing in the New England Journal of Medicine told his readers that, "...there has been no apparent change in mortality from breast cancer among white or nonwhite women since 1950." (Lynes, 1989 10)

A.M.A. Suppresses Recent Cancer Vaccine, In Court

I'm leading up to a statement by orthodox medicine to it's practitioners.

It's important first, to include a few more testimonies about cancer. H. James Rand, the inventor of the heart defibrillator, together with Dr. Ayre, who is internationally recognized as a cancer specialist. Together with Dr. Robert Czajkowski, developed a vaccine that they were successfully testing on 600 terminally ill cancer patients, and were getting results.

In spite of their significant results the F.D.A. held a court hearing and had the vaccine banned. At this hearing none of the treated patients were allowed to testify. Senator Young, of Ohio, protested that none of these patients nor their doctors were allowed at the trial for testimony, but apparently got nowhere against James L. Goddard who was the then Commissioner of The F.D.A.. Senator Young said that the court was adamant in their ruling and said, "It's wrong of the Government to snatch away this hope when there is no evidence against its (the vaccine) use offered in court, it's damnably wrong."

Do As I Say, Not As I Do

This is an relevant place to add a piece of irony, to the discussion. The irony occurred when Dr. Goddard's wife was seriously ill, and she was not having any results with the orthodox medical approaches. Goddard, had her successfully treated, with no mention, by alternative healers. (Lynes, 1989 19)....

Many Cures Exist For Cancer

Dr. Robert Atkins, M.D.

There is not one, but many cures for cancer available. But they are being systematically suppressed (Lynes, 1989 7).

Read carefully, all the evidence that I have presented, and you may get a parting impression of why our country is so sick.

Cancer Is Not To Be Treated As An Individual Disease

This statement comes from Dr. Vincent Devita, Jr., who in 1987, was the President of the Government's own National Cancer Institute. In front of 13,000 cancer specialists, that in turn would treat millions of women, he announced that cancer specialists should give chemotherapy and perform surgery on all women with breast cancer, regardless of whether it has spread. (Lynes, 1989 10)

Curing Cancer Would Be Bad Business

Arizona State University professor Edward J. Sylvester has the following to say about why cancer is not curable by the orthodox medical establishment:

A noted cancer specialist in Boston said, he believed that if some simple and inexpensive replacement for chemotherapy for the treatment for cancer were found tomorrow, all U.S. medical schools would teeter on the verge of bankruptcy, so integral a part of hospital revenues is oncology, the medical specialty of cancer treatment (Lynes, 1989 8).

Dr. James Crick on Cancer

To close this chapter, I offer five words from Dr. James Crick, a much respected scientist, and the winner of the Nobel prize for discovering the shape of D.N.A.  Dr. Crick also served on the National Cancer Advisory board for two years in the 1970's. When he was asked to comment on the National Cancer Program, he replied with. . .

IT'S A BUNCH OF SHIT (Lynes, 1989 1).